Michael Hicks

    Profile

    Michael practices all aspects of intellectual property law, including patents, trade marks and passing off, copyright, designs and domain names.
    Computer software and hardware disputes and other IT related disputes.
    Franchising, dealership and licence agreement disputes.
    IP and IT related contractual matters.
    Other cases involving technical or scientific subject matter (e.g. sale of goods with technical issues)

    Cases

    House of Lords and European Court of Justice

    United Wire Ltd v Screen Repair Services (Scotland) Ltd [2001] R.P.C. 24 - House of Lords – Explanation of the law relating to the repair of patented articles (filter screens used in oil wells).

    Thetford Corp v. Fiamma SpA [1987] F.S.R. 244 (C.A.) and [1990] Ch. 339 (E.C.J.) - E.C.J. - Whether patent for article which was not in fact novel could be relied upon to prevent imports from Italy

    British Leyland Motor Corp Ltd v Armstrong Patents Co Ltd [1986] A.C. 577 [1986] R.P.C. 279 - House of Lords – whether defendants had right to make spare parts for motor cars.

    EI Du Pont de Nemours & Co (Witsiepe’s Application) [1982] FSR 303 - House of Lords – selection patents – whether claimed copolyesters described as especially effective because of their rapid hardening rates anticipated by earlier I.C.I. specification.

    Court of Appeal

    British Telecommunications Plc v One in a Million Ltd [1999] 1 W.L.R. 903, [1999] F.S.R. 1 - The leading UK case concerning Internet Domain names

    Inline Logistics Ltd v UCI Logistics Ltd [2002] R.P.C. 32 - Court of Appeal - confidential information in relation to design of warehousing system

    Inter Lotto (UK) Ltd v Camelot Group Plc [2004] R.P.C. 9 - Court of appeal - relationship between trade marks and passing off; whether registered trade mark defence to passing off claim; compatibility of Trade Marks Act 1994 with Community legislation

    Phones 4U Ltd v Phone4U.co.uk Internet Ltd [2007] R.P.C. 5 - Court of Appeal - passing off and infringement of registered trade mark by use of domain name - the case explains the difference between confusion and deception and the effect of a colour limitation in a registered trade mark.

    Other examples of recent cases

    waynerooney.com WIPO D2006-0916 and waynerooney.co.uk (Nominet DRS 03844) - Domain name ownership disputes.

    Pozzoli SpA v BDMO SA 29(7) I.P.D. 29056 - Patent infringement - DVD cases

    Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd [2006] E.M.L.R. 14 [2006] R.P.C. 14 - Leading copyright case on “look and feel” of computer software (video game).

    Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd (Interest on Costs) [2006] R.P.C. 15 - Whether interest is payable on costs only in exceptional circumstances.

    Haberman v Comptroller General of Patents [2004] R.P.C. 21 - Duty of patent office to provide information relating to patent applications

    Irvine v Talksport Ltd (Damages) [2003] E.M.L.R. 6 - Assessment of damages in passing off

    Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2002] 1 W.L.R. 2355, [2002] F.S.R. 60 - Passing off by use of photograph of F1 racing driver

    Cherie Blair v. Associated Newspapers Ltd (High Court, 2000) - Claim for interim injunction to restrain publication of diaries of nanny.

    Cambridge Technology Partners (UK) Ltd v Axial (UK) Ltd - Lengthy arbitration involving contractual claim and counterclaim in relation to computer software development contract

    Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (t/a Washington DC) [2000] F.S.R. 121 - Copyright in fabric design.

    Farmer v Moseley (Holdings) Ltd (t/a RTK Marine) [2001] 2 B.C.L.C. 572
    Farmer v Moseley (Holdings) Ltd (Security for Costs) [2001] 2 B.C.L.C. 572 [2002] B.P.I.R. 473 - Whether design rights owned by insolvent company or its director. Whether security for costs should be provided when liquidator assigned design rights to claimant in return for share of proceeds of litigation.

    Herbert v. Colt Car Company Limited (2001) - Arbitration concerning termination of car dealership agreement

    DAAWAT Trade Mark [2003] R.P.C. 11 - Appointed person - whether trade mark registered in bad faith contrary to section 3(6) of Trade Marks Act 1994

    Sport Universal SA v Prozone Holdings Ltd [2003] EWHC 204 - Practice relating to the disclosure of confidential source code in relation to software which tracked movement of football players on the pitch

    Beiersdorf AG v Ramlort Ltd [2004] E.T.M.R. 15 - Trade marks – parallel imports of “Nivea” products

    Monitoring Technologies Ltd v Bell Group Plc (2004) 27(2) I.P.D. 27015 - Security for costs in patent infringement action

    Directory & testimonial Quotes

    Chambers & Partners 2012

    In Intellectual Property: Michael is "a deeply impressive performer who "really gives extra value as he is always thinking about your case and how to help." A lawyer who "brings a lot of experience and is good at getting his hands dirty," he receives a good deal of praise for the soundness of his judgment and the efficacy of his advocacy style."

    In Information Technology: "Michael is a fantastically able senior junior," who recently worked on SAS v WPL, a case concerning the copyrightability of computer software functions. Particularly strong on the IP side of IT work, he is "a natural when it comes to drafting, and always produces strong opinions."

    In Media and Entertainment: "Michael Hick's recent media work has included acting for the owners of the rights to the works of Salvador Dali, as well as taking part in a dispute between computer games developers Codemasters and the organisers of the Le Mans 24 hour race."

    Legal 500 2011

    In Intellectual Property: Michael "has extensive and deep knowledge of IP law."

    In Media and Entertainment: "The very knowledgeable Michael Hicks is recommended for his expertise in interactive media and computer games consoles."

    In Information Technology: Michael is "highly recommended for software related work and provides good and practical input."

    Chambers & Partners 2011 Michael "impresses as "user-friendly, approachable and excellent with clients." "Enthusiastic and hard-working," he is sought out for his expertise in the electronic, computers and software fields. He recently acted for SAS institute in a claim against World Programming in the design of computer software."

    Also mentioned in the Legal 500

    Qualifications and Regulations

    Qualifications

    School: Brighton College
    University: Trinity College, Cambridge – open scholarship to read natural sciences.

    Regulation

    Michael is a self-employed, independent barrister whose practice is governed by the Code of Conduct of the Bar of England and Wales. He is registered with the Bar Standards Board of England and Wales (Bar Ref: 13630)
     
    He has professional indemnity insurance provided by the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund (BMIF Ref: 2190/047). Please refer to the BMIF website  for full details of the world-wide cover provided, and the BMIF’s contact details.

    Human interest

    Racing dinghies and keelboats

    Contact us

    Telephone +44 (0)20 7404 0404
    Facsimile +44 (0)20 7404 0505
    clerks@hogarthchambers.com
    Postal Address:
    5 New Square
    Lincoln's Inn
    London
    WC2A 3RJ
    DX LDE 16

    Michael Hicks

    Practice areas