‘Leading Junior’ Ranked: Tier 1 – for ME – Legal 500 2023 and Chambers & Partners 2023
“Gwilym Harbottle is the master of copyright. He’s very stealthy, polite and mild-mannered, but through his cross-examination he can get the witness to give away the whole case. He is like a very polite British ninja.” Chambers & Partners 2023
“Gwilym is very intelligent and really knows the law – practical, pragmatic and a strong commercial sense.” Legal 500 2023
“Gwilym’s deep knowledge of the music and entertainment industry is exceptional, and is crucial in being able to develop a strategy for each case.” Legal 500 2023
“A terrific, academically accomplished barrister. He is very persuasive on his feet.” “Gwilym is one of the best-kept secrets at the IP Bar. I particularly recommend him for copyright work and matters in the arts and creative industries. He is clever and good on his feet.” Chambers & Partners 2022
“Gwilym has a fantastic knowledge of copyright law and can explain the technicalities of this area to professional and lay clients alike.” Legal 500 2022
“He is first rate both in terms of his knowledge of the subject matter and in the quality and commerciality of his advice.” Chambers & Partners 2020
“He is very thorough, keeps up with the law and likes to think outside the box in terms of what weapons you can use to fight various issues” Chambers & Partners 2018
“He is intelligent, available and very down-to-earth. He provides high-quality work and is very professional.” Chambers & Partners 2017
Most of Gwilym Harbottle’s practice is in soft IP and Media and Entertainment. His IP practice covers copyright and related rights (a particular expertise), trade marks and passing off, designs and data protection. He draws on both his IP and his Chancery/Commercial expertise when acting in Media and Entertainment disputes.
He has advised and represented many of the leading copyright collecting societies and major brand owners. Recent interesting cases have concerned cartoons, film co-production agreements, streamripping, cyberlockers, NFTs and online review sites.
He has extensive experience in High Court and IPEC litigation but has also been instructed in the Copyright Tribunal, as an expert witness on UK copyright law and by trade bodies to advise on proposed and new legislative developments.
He continues to have a significant caseload in the Chancery/Commercial field, with a particular interest in real property law.
He is an editor of Copinger on Copyright (18th edn, 2021).
Directory & Testimonial Quotes
Chambers & Partners 2023
Intellectual Property: “Gwilym Harbottle is the master of copyright. He’s very stealthy, polite and mild-mannered, but through his cross-examination he can get the witness to give away the whole case. He is like a very polite British ninja.”
Chambers & Partners 2022
Intellectual Property: “A terrific, academically accomplished barrister. He is very persuasive on his feet.” “Gwilym is one of the best-kept secrets at the IP Bar. I particularly recommend him for copyright work and matters in the arts and creative industries. He is clever and good on his feet.”
Chambers & Partners 2020
Intellectual Property: “He is first-rate in his subject matter knowledge and the quality and commerciality of his advice.” “He gives confidence that no little wrinkles will be overlooked.”
Media & Entertainment: “He is very client-friendly and always impresses with his attention to detail.” “He has a huge brain and really considers all of the points in a case.”
Chambers & Partners 2019
Intellectual Property: “He gets on top of complex matters quickly, even if they involve specialist sectors. He is a team player and I always feel that he is working with me and my client. I appreciate his candour.”
Media & Entertainment: “He is extremely thorough and has great attention to detail. He is prompt in turning around work, is very approachable, easy to deal with and a confident advocate.”
Chambers & Partners 2018
Intellectual Property: “He is very thorough, keeps up with the law and likes to think outside the box in terms of what weapons you can use to fight various issues”
Media & Entertainment: ”He’s excellent in court with a keen eye for detail.” “His grasp of the technicalities of copyright law, particularly when it comes to music publishing, is impressive.”
Chambers & Partners 2017
Intellectual Property: “He is intelligent, available and very down-to-earth. He provides high-quality work and is very professional.”
Media & Entertainment: “He is razor-sharp, with an impressive grasp of substantive and highly complex detail.”
Chambers & Partners 2016 “One of the Bar’s most eminent authorities on copyright law …” “He is very experienced in the field of copyright across the board and provides clear and concise advice”.
Intellectual Property: “He is very experienced in the field of copyright across the board and provides clear and concise advice”. “An elegant draftsman of pleadings and other documents”.
Media & Entertainment: “He is very knowledgeable, very dependable and a very effective advocate.” “He really knows his stuff”. “He gives you exactly what you need in a client-focused manner”.
Chambers & Partners 2014
Intellectual Property: “Praised by commentators for his prowess in copyright cases, he undertakes other types of soft IP in addition. He’s an experienced practitioner with 25 years in the field.” “He has a complete command of copyright law and is a go-to person for anything on copyright.”
Media & Entertainment: “A seasoned hand at record company contract disputes, who is much sought after by the major collecting agencies for contentious copyright disputes.” He is valued for his “very calm and sensible” approach. “He is very experienced in the field of copyright and provides clear and concise advice.”
Chambers & Partners 2013
Intellectual Property: “has an “immense reputation for copyright work,” with one source saying: “What he doesn’t know about copyright isn’t worth knowing.” He is also called upon frequently for instructions concerning design rights and trade marks.”
Media and Entertainment: “offers valuable input into high-level copyright and collecting society disputes, …. His key strengths include being “extremely bright” and “very good at nailing down complicated academic copyright points.”
Chambers & Partners 2012
Media & Entertainment: “Terribly clever and always takes an intellectual approach to his work.” He regularly advises and acts for PRS, and was recently involved in a copyright claim by artist Roger Dean, who is best known for designing record covers for prog rock legends like Yes, Asia and Uriah Heep.”
Legal 500 2023
Intellectual Property: “Gwilym is very intelligent and really knows the law – practical, pragmatic and a strong commercial sense.”
Media & Entertainment: “Gwilym’s deep knowledge of the music and entertainment industry is exceptional, and is crucial in being able to develop a strategy for each case.”
Legal 500 2022
Intellectual Property: “Gwilym has a fantastic knowledge of copyright law and can explain the technicalities of this area to professional and lay clients alike.”
Media & Entertainment: “Gwilym has a fantastic knowledge of copyright law and is able to explain the technicalities of this area to professional and lay clients alike.”
Legal 500 2021
Intellectual Property: “A well-respected barrister practicing in this specialist area”
Media & Entertainment: “Bright as a button and methodical, a very capable junior”
Legal 500 2020
Media & Entertainment: “He is an intelligent, hardworking and commercial barrister.”
Legal 500 2019
Intellectual Property: “He is intelligent, approachable and commercial.”
Media & Entertainment: “He is client friendly and clever (without being flashy).”
Legal 500 2017
Intellectual Property: ”A hardworking, intelligent and approachable advocate.”
Media & Entertainment: “He is not only extremely knowledgeable on copyright matters but very good in court.”
Legal 500 2016
Intellectual Property: “He has a good eye for detail and makes clear submissions.”
Media & Entertainment: “Hardworking, intelligent, approachable and reliable.”
Legal 500 2015
Intellectual Property: “Very knowledgeable on complex IP issues.”
Media and Entertainment: “A great communicator who is also practical and efficient.”
Legal 500 2013
Media and Entertainment: “user-friendly and thorough.”
Legal 500 2012
Intellectual Property: “highly regarded … ‘very good on matters where there is a criminal element’”
Media and Entertainment: “The ‘thorough, user-friendly’ Gwilym Harbottle and Amanda Michaels handle trade mark and copyright matters.”
World Trade Mark Review 2017
“Exceptionally smart, while also commercial and practical.”
Gwilym is regarded in Who’s Who Legal: Trademarks 2015 for sports and entertainment.
Gwilym Harbottle read Modern History at Oxford before studying Law at City University, London. He was called to the Bar in 1987.
Gwilym has recently spoken on a variety of IP issues including:
- IP online and the position of ISPs (WIPO online workshops in South Korea and Kazakhstan, 2012 and 2022)
- Anton Piller orders, Mareva injunctions and Norwich Pharmacal orders in copyright cases (ALAI Congress, Montreal, 2018)
- GS Media, Filmspeler and The Pirate Bay (BLACA May 2018)
- Copyright Law and Remedies (WIPO Building Respect for Intellectual Property programme, Kigali January 2017 and Baku December 2017)
- Copyright exceptions including quotation, parody and temporary copying
- Orphan works
- European jurisdiction in copyright cases
- Hyperlinking and copyright infringement
- Blocking injunctions
IP and Media/Entertainment
Entertainment One UK Limited v Công Ty TNHH Đầu Tư Công Nghệ Và Dịch Vụ Sconnect Việtnam  EWHC 3295 (Ch). Acting for the claimant in a multi-jurisdictional copyright, trade mark and passing off claim concerning the Peppa Pig children’s videos. Artistic copyright claim covers virtually all Berne Convention countries. Sound recording copyright claim covers virtually all Rome Convention countries. Trade mark claim covers the UK and EU27. The Court rejected service and jurisdiction challenges and the claim will now go to trial in England and Wales. Decision contains important discussion about email service.
Portobello Productions Ltd v SunnyMarch Ltd  EWHC 3014 (Ch). Acting for the defendant in a complex claim arising from the termination of a co-production agreement relating to a film based on a Roald Dahl story. Issues included construction of the agreement and implication of terms.
Young Turks v BT  EWHC 410(Ch). The first blocking order decision relating to streamripping sites.
Capitol Records v BT  EWHC 409 (Ch);  ECDR 7. The first blocking order decision relating to “cyberlocker” sites.
Kurobuta Ltd v Hallsworth (Appointed Person; 25.11.20)  RPC 13. Significant decision about whether it is possible to assign goodwill without assigning the underlying business.
Response Clothing Ltd v Edinburgh Woollen Mill Ltd  EWHC 148 (IPEC);  ECDR 11. Copyright in a fabric design. The first UK case to consider the impact of recent EU case law on what is a “copyright work”.
Asia Standard Management Services Ltd v Standard International Management LLC  EWHC 28 (Ch). Trade mark appeal to the High Court on extent to which Hearing Officers need to consider goods and services individually in likelihood of confusion cases.
Phonographic Performance Ltd v Ellis (t/a Bla Bla Bar)  EWCA Civ 2812;  ECDR 12. Important decision on availability of additional damages in committal applications where the breach is also a copyright infringement.
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v Kellmatt Ltd  EWHC 2090 (IPEC): Liability of printer for manufacture and sale and use by counterfeiter of trade marked labels.
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v Premier Alloy Wheels (UK) Ltd  EWHC 1713 (Ch): Acting for claimant in obtaining Anton Piller and related orders against seller of allegedly counterfeit alloy wheels. Claim succeeded at trial:  EWHC 20194 (Pat);  E.T.M.R. 55.
BMW v Technosport London Ltd  EWCA Civ 779;  E.T.M.R. 32;  F.S.R. 35: Represented successful claimant in claim for trade mark infringement by use by a garage operator of BMW name and logos.
Oran Pre-Cast v Oranmore Precast Ltd  EWHC 1846 (IPEC): A trade mark and passing off case. This case also involved breach of contractual issues as to whether the claim had been compromised.
Phonographic Performance Ltd v Nightclub (London) Ltd  EWHC 892 (Ch): Committal for breach of injunction restraining public playing of sound recordings.
Hook v Sumner  EWHC 3820 (Ch);  BCC 220: Represented Peter Hook in successful application for permission to bring derivative action arising from a dispute between the members of the band New Order.
Motivate Publishing FZ LLC v Hello Ltd  EWHC 1554 (Ch): Trade mark licensing and estoppel.
Band Therapy Ltd v Heavy Truth Music Publishing Ltd  EWHC 3811 (IPEC);  EWHC 1253 (IPEC): Dispute about ownership of rights in compositions.
AFD Software Limited v. DCML Limited  EWCA Civ 425: A copyright claim concerning “click wrap” licensing.
BMW v Coley  EWHC 3053 (IPEC): Declaration that certain activities infringed trade mark injunction.
Phonographic Performance Ltd v Raine  EWHC 1398(Ch): Stay of infringement proceedings pending reference to Copyright Tribunal.
Henderson v All Around the World Records Ltd  EWPCC 7;  EWPCC 19: Rights in performances and costs in the Patents County Court.
Orion Publishing Group Ltd v Novel Entertainment Ltd  EWHC 1951 (Ch): Audit clauses in publishing agreements.
R v Woolworths  F.S.R. 19: Successful defence of retailer against trade mark prosecution.
PPL v Reader  F.S.R. 42: Availability and quantum of damages for infringement of sound recording copyright which was also a contempt of court.
Bamgboye v Reid  EMLR 61: Successful claim for copyright and performer’s rights in rap composition and recording.
Guild v Eskandar Ltd  F.S.R. 38 (Rimer J);  F.S.R. 3 (CA): Defence of claim for infringement copyright and design right in designer clothing field (succeeded on appeal).
Thames & Hudson Ltd v Design and Artists Copyright Society Ltd  F.S.R. 15: Relationship between criminal and civil remedies for copyright infringement.
Chancery Bar Association
IP Bar Association
British Literary and Artistic Copyright Association
Qualifications and Regulations
Gwilym Harbottle read Modern History at Oxford before studying Law at City University, London. He was called to the Bar in 1987. He is an accredited mediator through ADR Chambers.
Gwilym is a self-employed, independent barrister whose practice is governed by the Code of Conduct of the Bar of England and Wales. He is registered with the Bar Standards Board of England and Wales (Bar Ref: 22468)
He has professional indemnity insurance provided by the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund (BMIF Ref: 2190/020). Please refer to the BMIF website for full details of the world-wide cover provided, and the BMIF’s contact details.
Gwilym’s interests include literature, art, photography and walking.